Title: Trading Up
Author: Candace Bushnell
Genre: contemporary, general fiction
Series: N/A
Pages: 320 (paperback version)
Published: July 2003
Rating: 1/5
(I tend toward character-driven rather than plot-driven novels) this was a particularly hard read for me. Also half the time I didn't know where the book was because I'd been so irate at parts of the narrative I threw it across the living room.
In this modern-day New York travesty, the main character, Janey, is self-absorbed, rude, annoying, SUPERFICIAL, and all she wants is a rich man who will take care of her. Those are *seriously* her goals for her life; everything she has achieved on her own is of no merit because she lacks a husband. I have so many issues with the morals and ideals of this character that I am literally flabbergasted. She uses her sister constantly for what she can get from the situation(instead of being there for her sister after more than one life-shaking event, Janey uses her to get into a fancy restaurant and publicity), her lovers, her "best friend"... if I knew a woman that actually acted like Janey, I'd slap her, without compunction.
I've read other books by Bushnell, and thought they were alright, if definitely very far from spectacular or even good. They're readable, possibly just because they are so so bad you can't help but be entertained. This particular story left a very bad taste in my mouth: Janey is possibly my least favorite female protagonist of the last year. And that's saying something. AVOID AVOID AVOID this novel if you've a working brain and don't want to throw a book across the room.
Continuing my Bushnell torture:
Title: Sex and the City
Author: Candace Bushnell
Genre: contemporary, general fiction
Series: N/A
Pages: 304 (trade paperback version)
Published: 1996
Rating: 1/5
As a fan of the ubiquitous, outrageous and beloved show, I had a desire to read the sourc material as I have always always enjoyed the book over the show/movie/puppet re-enaction. This is the very first time (that I can remember) where that is not the case: I'll take the show and even those two atrocious movies over this crapfest. What was a fun, frothy, sexy show with independent and strong women was a soul-crushing excursion into the minds of characters so flat I could apply makeup while standing on them. Candace Bushnell might have had the right idea but she had no idea about how to execute it. Without Darren Star and the writing team at Showtime, the Samantha, Charlotte, Miranda and even Carrie we all love or love-to-hate would never even have come close to existing.
Hey, I live just outside of Phoenix, well, kind of. I live in Gilbert ;) I noticed you said visiting for a week. Nice to have another Arizona person!
ReplyDeleteWow! I enjoy the honesty. I can see why you gave these shorter reviews. :)
ReplyDeleteChristina: that's awesome! I live in Flagstaff regularly, but I love trips down to Phoenix. Small world!
ReplyDeleteAnd Libby: haha and this is the restrained version. Hopefully I enjoy the next two more than those! :)
Safe travels! Plus I hope you get some time to recover -- sounds like you've got some craziness between work and your personal life!
ReplyDeleteRarely do I think a film/tv version surpasses a book's origins, but I agree with you on SATC. The tv format allowed the characters to have more depth, I think, and room to grow and change -- and become a little more palatable!
Can't wait to see what you think of BMA -- I'm starting it next week.
My sister used to live in Flagstaff. It's pretty awesome there, doesn't get as hot as it does here for sure!
ReplyDelete